Podcasters Welch and Sullivan apologize for Kirk joke

The tension between political satire and the gravity of assassination

The core of this matter lies in the boundary between political mockery and the celebration of death. The hosts of 'I’ve Had It' laughed at a post regarding the exhumation of Charlie Kirk, who was killed in September 2025. They also attributed the killer's political leanings to a specific movement, a claim that contradicts the suspect's voting record.

Whether this incident constitutes a momentary lapse in judgment or a deeper pattern of malice is the point of contention. One side views the laughter as an insensitive act of cruelty toward a murder victim. The other side may see it as a reaction to the absurdity of social media discourse. The sincerity of the apology and the donation to Everytown for Gun Safety are weighed against previous statements where one host suggested the victim justified his death. The resolution of this conflict depends on whether the apology is viewed as a moral correction or a reaction to the loss of sponsors like Cash App and Chewy.

Coverage focused on moral failure and the timing of remorse

The coverage across Breitbart, Fox News, and Mediaite converges on the theme of hypocrisy. All three outlets highlight that the apology followed the withdrawal of sponsors, framing the remorse as a financial necessity rather than a moral awakening. Fox News and Breitbart specifically emphasize the spread of misinformation regarding the killer's political affiliation to suggest a narrative-driven dishonesty.

Mediaite provides critical context by digging into the hosts' history, noting that one host had previously called the victim's wife a terrible person. This detail transforms the story from a single insensitive joke into a broader pattern of hostility. While the outlets agree on the insensitivity of the act, they differ in focus: Fox News brings in external political strategists to argue the hosts damaged their own political cause, while Mediaite focuses on the internal contradiction of the hosts' past rhetoric.