Security warnings followed the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Following the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk, reports emerged that the FBI advised ESPN commentator Pat McAfee to wear a bulletproof vest due to regular death threats. This advice was first reported by Front Office Sports and later cited by OutKick.
Pat McAfee later clarified that while the FBI and police agencies provided heavy security for a 'GameDay' event, the specific suggestion to wear a vest came from a security group rather than the FBI specifically.
The FBI reportedly advised Pat McAfee to wear a bulletproof vest following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, highlighting the security risks McAfee faces.
The FBI recommended Pat McAfee wear a bulletproof vest due to safety concerns following the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Pat McAfee clarifies the circumstances surrounding his security precautions and shares the disturbing nature of the social media threats he has received.
Security precautions amid a climate of violent threats
The assassination of Charlie Kirk has heightened safety concerns for media figures who occupy polarizing positions. Pat McAfee has received violent and homophobic death threats on social media, leading to high-level security coordination involving the FBI and police agencies for a 'GameDay' event.
A point of contention exists regarding the specific origin of the advice to wear a bulletproof vest. While some reports attributed this suggestion to the FBI, McAfee clarified that the recommendation came from a security group. The distinction rests on whether the warning was a formal federal directive or a tactical suggestion from private or auxiliary security personnel.
Confusion over sources and the framing of public hostility
Coverage across Fox News and Breitbart focused on the broader atmosphere of danger, linking McAfee's anxiety to the precedent of political assassination. These outlets highlighted the validation of his fears through the lens of external threats and official warnings.
NY Post provided the most necessary correction by detailing McAfee's own clarification. It moved beyond the sensational claim of an FBI-mandated vest to explain that the advice came from a security group. By including the specific nature of the social media threats, NY Post shifted the focus from a vague sense of danger to the concrete hostility McAfee faces.
Most outlets missed the opportunity to examine how security protocols for public figures are structured when federal agencies and private groups overlap. Instead, the coverage largely treated the security measures as a barometer for political tension.
News Story
Card 4 of 4 in this story
This card follows “Assassination of Charlie Kirk and Aftermath”
Loading comments...